Chaos: Making a New Science is a debut non-fiction book by James Gleick that initially introduced the principles and early development of the chaos theory to. Caos: GLEICK JAMES: Books – Title, Caos Osservatorio straniero. Author, James Gleick. Publisher, Rizzoli, ISBN, , Length, pages. Subjects. Science.
|Published (Last):||11 October 2016|
|PDF File Size:||5.28 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.94 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
My big grievance with this book is it falls too short. While its purpose is introductory and there’s little math, per se, I think the underlying profundities will be more obvious to readers who have taken a college-level math course or two or three.
I remember goeick about it while eating dinner one day in the cafeteria with my physics teacher and some friends from class.
Caos – James Gleick – Google Books
A mathematician turned meteorologist, Edward Lorenz, builds a “toy weather” on what’s still a fairly early computer in the early s, and in working with the parameters, concludes that long-term weather forecasting is doomed–a simple deterministic system is producing unpredictable results.
I’m moving the rating up a bit after my re-read on audio because it wasn’t that bad, although I still think it’s a bit overrated. The text remains in print and is widely used as an introduction to the topic for the mathematical layperson. However there were many sections that bored me and aperiodic jumps in his focus that left me lost a bit. Human consciousness itself seems to be an example of a chaotic, endlessly self-referential system.
Chaos: Making a New Science
The last month has been quite interesting thanks to both Chaos and Sync. And my ex-husband had it on his shelf and I never got around to reading it. Making a New Science is a debut non-fiction book by James Gleick that initially introduced the principles and early development of the chaos theory to the public. From Wikipedia, vaos free encyclopedia.
Then, you gleicm wind up contemplating how much of that migration was due to Jeff Goldblum’s ham-fisted illustration I finally read the book that ought to have been required reading for freshman physics majors for the past 20 years!
That is probably one of the reasons it did so well.
Caos La Creacion De Una Ciencia
In a complex system, the most minuscule change in acos conditions leads to drastic or unpredictable changes in the output. All articles with dead external links Articles with dead external links from May Pages to import images to Wikidata. Glieck 22, Muskan rated it it was amazing Shelves: His first book, Chaos: This book came out in the late 80s, and I’ve crossed paths with it several times without reading it. PaperbackFirst Editionpages.
It was very successful with a general audience back when it was new.
In each field, also, the initial work was most often either resisted or ignored. This book was a disappointment. If I had the time, I’d like to run the calculations myself, as they seem within the reach of anyone with a laptop. While some may say this makes it a less informative book, for me this made it one of the most intriguing non-fiction books I have read. Making a new Science.
Making a New Science 4 24 Sep 03, I also didn’t care for the tone of the brief profiles of the various physicists and mathematicians – it felt like name-dropping to me. My favorite moments in the book are the ones when Gleick discusses the personal and intellectual challenges faced by scientists who struggled to find meaningful ideas gpeick express about phenomena that had been dismissed by generations of brilliant minds as meaningless “noise.
Instead, it focuses as much on the scientists studying chaos as on the chaos itself. It was heady, exciting–and much harder to explain than caoos demonstrate.
This is not a purely technical book. It is pop-science and definitely has its place. It is a breezy history of two decades of mostly disconnected work glfick by a number of different researchers in widely divergent areas of science.
A History, a Theory, a Flood.
Lists with This Book. As for chaos itself, Gleick does an outstanding job of explaining the thought processes and investigative techniques that researchers bring to bear on chaos problems. When reading science books, it’s difficult to know whether what you’re reading is current or not. This book, over two decades old now, is one of the gleeick classics of science popularization.
Chaos: Making a New Science by James Gleick
It seems to me like this book represents a time in history before people had gotten accustom to handling complexity and information theory in computers. The result is neither interesting nor informative. I enjoyed this investigation of the order underlying what we perceive as disorder, especially fractals.