ASTM G_Laboratory Immersion Corrosion Testing of Metals. August 18, | Author: Description. Designation: G 31 – 72 (Reapproved ). Buy ASTM G() Standard Practice for Laboratory Immersion Corrosion Testing of Metals from SAI Global. Offering ASTM G31 corrosion testing + modified tests to fit your needs and budget . Rapid, high-quality service by experts.
|Published (Last):||25 May 2012|
|PDF File Size:||3.66 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.8 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
If clad alloy specimens are to be used, special attention must be given to ensure that excessive metal is not removed. The values given in parentheses are for information only.
Determination of Metal Corrosion Rate by ASTM G31-72. Canadian Laboratory
The total surface area asgm a circular specimen is given by the following equation: If the specific effects of high velocity are to be studied, special techniques must be employed to transfer the 2. Active view current version of standard. Proper ultrasonic procedures are an acceptable alternate. Thank you for interesting in our services.
Link to Active This link will always route to the current Active version of the standard.
These factors include specimen preparation, apparatus, test conditions, methods of cleaning specimens, evaluation of results, and calculation and reporting of corrosion rates. The behavior of the specimens in this galvanic couple are compared with that of insulated specimens exposed on the same holder and the galvanic effects noted.
These factors include apparatus, sampling, aetm specimen, test conditions test solution composition, temperature, gas sparging, fluid motion, solution volume, method of supporting test specimens, duration of testmethods of cleaning test specimens, interpretation of results, and calculation of corrosion rates. We need your help!
Warning—In many cases the corrosion product on the reactive metals titanium and zirconium is a hard and tightly bonded oxide that defies removal by chemical or ordinary mechanical means. For example, a small coupon is not as prone to exhibit pitting as a large one and it is possible to miss the phenomenon altogether in the corrosion testing of certain alloys, such as the AISI Type series stainless steels in chloride contaminated environments.
However, there are cases where this assumption is not valid. Molarity and normality are also helpful in defining the concentration of chemicals in some test solutions.
Solvents such as acetone, carbon tetrachloride, and alcohol are used to remove oil, grease, or resin and are usually applied prior to other methods of cleaning. Scrubbing with a bristle brush and mild abrasive is the most popular of these methods. It is necessary to evaluate this localized corrosion separately from the overall mass loss. Separate and special techniques are employed for the specific evaluation of the susceptibility of metals and alloys to stress corrosion cracking see Ref.
Methods for chemical cleaning after testing of specific metals and alloys are described in Practice G 1. Warning- In many cases the corrosion product on the reactive metals titanium and zirconium is a hard and tightly bonded oxide that defies removal by chemical or ordinary mechanical means.
G 31 — 72 Reapproved Standard Practice for Laboratory Immersion Corrosion Testing of Metals1 This standard is issued under the fixed designation G 31; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.
Any necessary distortion of the test conditions must be considered when interpreting the results.
Please copy and paste this embed script to where you want to embed Embed Script. The coupling of corrosion coupons then yields only qualitative results, as a particular coupon reflects only the relationship between these two metals at the particular area ratio involved. If agitation is required, the apparatus can be modified to accept a suitable stirring mechanism, such as a magnetic stirrer. It may be desirable to test a aztm representative of the material and metallurgical conditions used awtm practice.
It is impractical to propose an inflexible standard laboratory corrosion testing procedure for general use, except for material qualification tests where standardization is required. The density in the constant K cancels out the density in the corrosion rate equation. The phenomenon of forming a protective film is observed with many corrosion-resistant materials. NOTE 1—The flask can be used as a versatile and convenient apparatus to conduct simple immersion tests.
With a thickness of approximately 3 mm 0. A distinction should be atm between those occurring underneath the supporting devices concentration cells and those on the surfaces that were freely exposed to the test solution see Guide G It is imperative to note that this usually occurs with no significant loss in mass of the test coupon, although certain refractory metals are an exception to these observations.
We are a non-profit group that run this website to share documents. This can be accomplished by analysis of the solution after corrosion has occurred. Significance and Use 3. A liquid atmospheric seal is required on the test vessel to prevent further contamination. This resurfacing may cause some surface work hardening, to an extent which will be determined by the vigor of the surfacing operation, but is not ordinarily significant.
Immersion Corrosion Testing According to ASTM G31 Standard
However, the absence of cracking should not be interpreted as indicating resistance see 4. A typical resin flask setup for this type test is shown in Fig. The values given in parentheses are for information only. In practice, only alloys of the same general type should be exposed in the testing apparatus. This standard, rather than a standardized procedure, is presented as a guide so that some of the pitfalls of such testing may be avoided.
This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. This can be done by chemical treatment picklingelectrolytic removal, or by grinding with a coarse abrasive paper or cloth such as No. It should be used as a reference to ensure that the test will allow generation of data relevant to the application with the minimum of interferences. Where required, the exhausted constituents should be added or a fresh solution provided during the course of the test.
The surface finish to be encountered in service may be more appropriate for some testing.